Search for: "Amici Curiae Legal Scholars and Advocates" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2016, 8:17 am by Allison Orr Larsen and Neal Devins
Last term, amici curiae, or “friends of the court,” filed 863 briefs at the court – an average of 13 per case argued – and the justices cited these briefs in 54 percent of the cases they decided. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:26 am
Has the emergence of increasingly complex disputes led to intervenors/amici curiae becoming an indispensable element of international legal proceedings? [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 11:31 am
Has the emergence of increasingly complex disputes led to intervenors/amici curiae becoming an indispensable element of international legal proceedings? [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm by Schachtman
In revisiting Daubert, therefore, we might imagine that legal scholars and scientists would be interested in the anatomy of the errors that led Bendectin plaintiffs stridently to maintain their causal claims. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 6:55 pm by Will Baude
"). 73: See Brief of Amici Curiae AHA and Organization of American Historians, supra note 69, at 1-2. 74: Blackhawk, supra note 27, at 1861. 75: Id. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm by Roberto M. Suárez
Kappos and many scholars, business leaders, and legal professionals try their best to anticipate how the Court will rule. [read post]
Academic: a brief written by legal scholars, usually scholars who are already experts in a given field. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 8:49 am by Rachel Sachs
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C. represented Achmed et al. and the Center for Justice and Accountability as amici curiae in support of the petitioners.] [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:36 am by Florian Mueller
However, the FTC's future amici curiae will be free to argue what they want, and amici often go beyond what the party they support says. [read post]
26 May 2022, 2:16 pm by Dan Rodriguez
Udo-Okon would train a group of “justice advocates” to give targeted, limited legal advice to individuals facing debt collections. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:25 am by Floyd Abrams
” Of this I will say no more than that no other legal scholar that I have ever read left behind such sublime prose. [read post]
23 May 2023, 4:00 am by Catherine Morris
International human rights organizations and legal scholars from Canada, the United States, Australia, and Europe, have also examined the discrediting law and its application, finding that it violates Russia’s international law obligations as well. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:28 pm by Kenneth Propp, Peter Swire
Nor did it cite an assessment by Oxford scholars that reviewed U.S. surveillance reforms after Snowden and found “much clearer rules on the authorization and limits on the collection, use, sharing, and oversight of data relating to foreign nationals than the equivalent laws of almost all EU Member States. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am by David Kopel
The normal procedure is that a party's lawyers know who the friendly amici are and share a list with other friendly amici. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 10:53 am by Adam Feldman
Possible signals include the lawyer who authored the petition, amici curiae at the cert stage and the language of the petition. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
Embracing three amici curiae submissions, the Court heard the matter on an expedited basis and expanded the concept of a SLAPP suit to abuse of process in criminal proceedings. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am by Marty Lederman
” The Court has appointed Professor Vicki Jackson (my former colleague at DOJ and at Georgetown — and one of the very finest federal courts scholars) as an amicus curiae to argue that the answers to those two questions are “yes” and “no,” respectively. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:36 am by Ilya Somin
Brief for Players Association of the National Football League et al. as Amici Curiae 17. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
See Brief for Scholars of the Constitutional Rights of Children as Amici Curiae 22–27. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]